Faculty Presentations
Initiating and Managing Home Mechanical Ventilation in COPD
High intensity NIV for COPD
Current Activity
| Nicholas Hart, PhD, MRCP |
Fig. 01 -
EU Perspective
Fig. 02 -
Who, How and When
Fig. 03 -
Studies, RCTs & Clinical Experience
Fig. 04 -
Studies, RCTs & Clinical Experience
Fig. 05 -
Clinical Practice
Fig. 06 -
NIV Utilisation
Fig. 07 -
2. Studies, RCTs & Clinical Experience
Fig. 08 -
Mechanisms of Improvement
Fig. 09 -
Three Hypotheses
Fig. 10 -
PaCO₂, PaO₂, mM/1, Epworth Sleepiness
Fig. 11 -
Hypercapnic
Fig. 12 -
3. Studies, RCTs & Clinical Experience
Fig. 13 -
The Negative Study
Fig. 14 -
Negative Pressure
Fig. 15 -
Poor Adherence, Sleep, Trial Failure
Fig. 16 -
Mechanical Ventilation Equipment Photo
Fig. 17 -
The other negative positive trials…
Fig. 18 -
Non-evasive Ventilition Trials
Fig. 19 -
Failed Trials
Fig. 20 -
Low airways pressures, Poor patient selection, Poor Compliance
Fig. 21 -
UK Based Study
Fig. 22 -
Positive Clinical Trial Results
Fig. 23 -
Avcow Trial, Australia
Fig. 24 -
2 year Mortality
Fig. 25 -
Murphy & Hart, Thorax 2014
Fig. 26 -
IPAP / EPAP
Fig. 27 -
4. Studies, RCTs & Clinical Experience
Fig. 28 -
Adequate Nocturnal Ventilatory Control
Fig. 29 -
High vs Low Intensity
Fig. 30 -
Breathing Rate Differientation
Fig. 31 -
Overnight Improvement
Fig. 32 -
Intensity vs Pressure
Fig. 33 -
Difference Between Treatments
Fig. 34 -
High Pressure vs Backup Rate
Fig. 35 -
Randomized Crossover Trial
Fig. 36 -
Null Hypothesis
Fig. 37 -
Respiratory & Ventilator Parameters
Fig. 38 -
Sleep actigraphy
Fig. 39 -
Sleep comfort & quality
Fig. 40 -
Severe Respiratory Insufficiency
Fig. 41 -
Clinical Message
Fig. 42 -
Timing of Initiation
Fig. 43 -
Outcome after AECOPD
Fig. 44 -
UK Data
Fig. 45 -
Unstable vs Stable
Fig. 46 -
Unstable Post AECOPD
Fig. 47 -
Netherlands Trial
Fig. 48 -
Baseline Charachteristics
Fig. 49 -
Kaplan Myer Data
Fig. 50 -
Admission Free Survival at 12 months
Fig. 51 -
Lack of Effect with HMV
Fig. 52 -
What Have We Learnt?
Fig. 53 -
Failure to deliver
Fig. 54 -
Inapporpriate primary outcome
Fig. 55 -
Inapporpriate target population
Fig. 56 -
PaCO₂ vs PaO₂
Fig. 57 -
Failure of the Intervention Itself
Fig. 58 -
Chronic Stable COPD Patients
Fig. 59 -
Non-invasive positive pressure
Fig. 60 -
Advanced disease
Fig. 61 -
Low Emergency admission rate
Fig. 62 -
PaCO2 in HMV group
Fig. 63 -
Subgroup HRQL Analysis
Fig. 64 -
Lower all-cause mortality
Fig. 65 -
Need to Treat
Fig. 66 -
Effect with HMV?
Fig. 67 -
Delivery of the intervention
Fig. 68 -
Delivery of the intervention
Fig. 69 -
Appropriate primary outcome
Fig. 70 -
Appropriate target population
Fig. 71 -
Intervention Clinically Effective
Fig. 72 -
Summary
Fig. 73 -
Who, How, When, Which?
Fig. 74 -
Patient Selection - Current Evidence
Fig. 75 -
Patient Selection - Ongoing Trials
Fig. 76 -
Independent Data Monitoring
Fig. 77 -
Mode of NIV - How?
Fig. 78 -
Mode of NIV - Current Evidence
Fig. 79 -
Timing of Initiation - When?
Fig. 80 -
Timing of Initiation - Current Evidence
Fig. 81 -
Timing of Initiation - Ongoing
Fig. 82 -
Best Outcome - Which?
Fig. 83 -
Best Outcome Measures
Fig. 84 -
Novel Autotitrating Devices
Fig. 85 -
Manuscript Under Review ERJ Quote
Fig. 86 -
Patient flow through trial protocol
Fig. 87 -
Comparisons: Table 1 / Table 2
Fig. 88 -
No difference
Fig. 89 -
Comparisons: Table 1 / Table 3
Fig. 90 -
No difference
Fig. 91 -
Table 4: Comparison of Ventilator settings
Fig. 92 -
First report of application
Fig. 93 -
Conclusion
Fig. 94 -
NIV used in Europe
Fig. 95 -
Affiliations
Fig. 96 -
Summary
